Contradicting its own previous coverage in addition to the actual geography, Haaretz erroneously reviews that development in the E-1 space, between Jerusalem and Ma’aleh Adumim to the east, would divide the West Bank in two. CAMERA prompts correction of a Reuters article which erroneously reported that the bilateral peace accords require Israel to grant West Bank or Gaza residency standing to 4,000 spouses of Palestinians. AFP corrects after erroneously reporting that Gaza “is fenced in on three sides by Israel.” In reality, Egypt sits on one of the three land borders. After CAMERA posts a critique and introduces the hashtag #SadSadIsrael, 1000’s of smiling Israelis ridicule a current New York Times story about “what it means to be Israeli.” A Deutsche Welle Arabic headline falsely alleges that Israel permitted development of “new settlements.” But because the media outlet’s English headline stories, the permits are for brand new homes in established settlements. The Israeli authorities’s current choice to designate six NGOs for his or her terrorist ties has sparked condemnations from press and policymakers.
Cnn’s “jerusalem” Collection On The Six Day Struggle: When Jews Are Shelled, Arabs Suffer
Yet, many major media retailers could not worry to report Tehran’s threats. Haaretz’s English version at present commendably amends two reviews which whitewashed the crimes of Pakistani terrorist Aafia Siddiqui as “alleged,” when in reality she was convicted of tried homicide in 2010. Eviction of Palestinian residents of Sheikh Jarrah who did not prove ownership or present cost of hire as protected tenants … Read More